Re: pg_migrator progress
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19715.1238262677@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator progress (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_migrator progress
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> But having said that, there isn't any real harm in fixing the OID >> counter to match what it was. You need to run pg_resetxlog to set the >> WAL position and XID counter anyway, and it can set the OID counter too. > FYI, I decided against restoring the oid counter because it might > collide with an oid assigned during pg_migrator schema creation. That argument seems pretty empty --- why is it more likely than a collision happening if you *don't* restore the oid counter? And why would it matter anyway? We fixed the problems with oid collisions some time ago. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: