Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
От | Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090305164149.228110@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? (raf <raf@raf.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hello raf, > > > Easier is just > > > select oid::regprocedure from pg_proc where <whatever> > note that this method doesn't produce a complete function > signature. the precision and scale of numerics are not > included in the output. hopefully, that won't matter for > your needs. Oh. So functions expecting e.g. numeric(5,2) as argument wouldn't be listed correctly? Is this going to be fixed then? Fornow all I need is the 'full' function name necessary for GRANT/REVOKE. I guess this will do for now for 'non-numeric'-functions?: SELECT DISTINCT p.oid::regprocedure::text FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc p LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON n.oid = p.pronamespaceWHERE nspname !~* '^pg_' AND nspname != 'information_schema' Thank you very much, Peter -- Computer Bild Tarifsieger! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: