Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
От | raf |
---|---|
Тема | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090305003259.GA24998@raf.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? (Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de) |
Ответы |
Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de wrote: > Hello Ashish, Hello Tom, > > thank you very much for your quick and helpful replies - I really appreciate that. > > > > May be this will help you: > > > > Easier is just > > select oid::regprocedure from pg_proc where <whatever> > > I guess I'll go with the very nifty type cast suggested by Tom though as this covers aggregate functions as well. Thispossibility should be mentioned in the docs - together with the system information functions http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-info.html > > Too bad that this function syntax isn't part of information_schema. > > Thank you very much to both of you. > note that this method doesn't produce a complete function signature. the precision and scale of numerics are not included in the output. hopefully, that won't matter for your needs. cheers, raf
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: