Re: vacuumdb --freeze
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuumdb --freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200902191739.n1JHdvC01128@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuumdb --freeze (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuumdb --freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at> writes: > > I am still answering here because my question was related to upgrade. > > I think you need to turn off autovacuum before freezing to avoid a later analyze > > that unfreezes pg_class (or the stats table). > > vacuum analyze doesn't unfreeze pg_class. It could create unfrozen > tuples in pg_statistic, perhaps, but we could easily fix that by > truncating pg_statistic afterwards (its not like there will be useful > data there...) I have added --analyze to the vacuumdb command and documented its purpose. > The end goal is going to be to have all this work happen in a standalone > backend, rather than risk firing up the postmaster while the database is > in an unstable state. So I would counsel spending as little effort as > possible on filing off rough edges that are related to the > using-a-postmaster scenario. Any idea how to do that? Would we have to leave the libpq API? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: