Re: vacuumdb --freeze
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: vacuumdb --freeze |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10312.1235065791@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: vacuumdb --freeze (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: vacuumdb --freeze
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> vacuum analyze doesn't unfreeze pg_class. It could create unfrozen
>> tuples in pg_statistic, perhaps, but we could easily fix that by
>> truncating pg_statistic afterwards (its not like there will be useful
>> data there...)
> I have added --analyze to the vacuumdb command and documented its
> purpose.
Surely that's backwards? What's the point of doing analyze work you'll
have to throw away?
>> The end goal is going to be to have all this work happen in a standalone
>> backend,
> Any idea how to do that?
I didn't say it was easy.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: