Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200812162258.16948.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 15 December 2008 23:56:08 Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC. They're not the same benchmark. > > Agreed. Somewhere earlier in the thread I mentioned that the OSDL > kits are non-spec-compliant, a little buggy, and sometimes give better > results than the real tests. Could we consolidate everyone's concerns into a project outline, if one is necessary? - Everyone would like to have a TPC-like benchmark kit. - OSDL script are not compliant. - OSDL scripts are outdated/appear unmaintained. - OSDL scripts need POstgreSQL-specific improvements. - EnterpriseDB is apparently maintaining their own fork. What can we do? I found the TPC-C spec on the web, so it's freely available for implementation, it appears.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: