Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200812161622.20185.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 15:58:15 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Monday 15 December 2008 23:56:08 Jonah H. Harris wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > > You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC. They're not the same benchmark. > > > > Agreed. Somewhere earlier in the thread I mentioned that the OSDL > > kits are non-spec-compliant, a little buggy, and sometimes give better > > results than the real tests. > > Could we consolidate everyone's concerns into a project outline, if one is > necessary? > > - Everyone would like to have a TPC-like benchmark kit. > - OSDL script are not compliant. > - OSDL scripts are outdated/appear unmaintained. > - OSDL scripts need POstgreSQL-specific improvements. > - EnterpriseDB is apparently maintaining their own fork. > Don't forget Jan's TPC-W benchmark, available at http://pgfoundry.org/projects/tpc-w-php/. Not sure if it still works, but Jan claims it did at one point. -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: