Re: Transactions within a function body
От | Reg Me Please |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactions within a function body |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200810021625.19719.regmeplease@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactions within a function body (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transactions within a function body
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Il Thursday 02 October 2008 16:15:10 Alvaro Herrera ha scritto: > Reg Me Please escribió: > > Well, if it is a limitation, and having it would lead to a "better > > product", why not making it a feature for the next still-open release? > > Because no one is working on implementing it? > > > In my opinion that's more than a limitation, it's a missing feature. > > In your code you often need to create savepoints to delay the decision > > for the commitment. > > A Pl/PgSQL function is just a bunch of code you want to move into the DB. > > So the need for savepoints seems to me to be still there. > > You can nest blocks arbitrarily, giving you the chance to selectively > rollback pieces of the function. It's only a bit more awkward. You mean I can issue a ROLLBACK command within a BEGIN...END; block to roll it back?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: