Re: Transactions within a function body
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactions within a function body |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081002141510.GA4151@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactions within a function body (Reg Me Please <regmeplease@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transactions within a function body
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Reg Me Please escribió: > Well, if it is a limitation, and having it would lead to a "better product", > why not making it a feature for the next still-open release? Because no one is working on implementing it? > In my opinion that's more than a limitation, it's a missing feature. > In your code you often need to create savepoints to delay the decision for the > commitment. > A Pl/PgSQL function is just a bunch of code you want to move into the DB. > So the need for savepoints seems to me to be still there. You can nest blocks arbitrarily, giving you the chance to selectively rollback pieces of the function. It's only a bit more awkward. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: