Re: Archived-At message header

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
> could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
> thread back up.  Maybe it's a dumb idea, though.  (Nobody would accuse
> me of never having dumb ideas in public.)

I've also thought about this in the past.  I don't think it's a dumb
idea -- perhaps it can be made to work.  I'm hesitant to continue to
build kluges on top of Mhonarc, though.  (I tried to get Abhijit
Menon-Sen interested in exploring the idea of using Archivopteryx to
drive our archives, but he seems to have even less time for
experimentation with such things than I do.)

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support