Re: libpq thread-locking
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq thread-locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080516160438.5dc59e0c@mha-laptop.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq thread-locking (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq thread-locking
Re: libpq thread-locking |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Attached patch adds some error checking to the thread locking > > > stuff in libpq. Previously, if thread locking failed for some > > > reason, we would just fall through and do things without locking. > > > This patch makes us abort() instead. It's not the greatest thing > > > probably, but our API doesn't let us pass back return values... > > > > I have looked over the patch and it seems fine, though I am > > concerned about the abort() case with no output. I realize stderr > > might be going nowhere, but in fe-print.c we do an fprintf(stderr) > > for memory failures so for consistency I think we should do the > > same here. If there is concern about code bloat, I suggest a macro > > at the top of the file for thread failure exits: > > > > #define THEAD_FAILURE(str) \ > > do { \ > > fprintf(stderr, libpq_gettext("Thread failure: > > %s\n")); \ exit(1); \ > > } while(0) > > Oh, this is Tom saying he doesn't like stderr and the added code lines > for failure: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-04/msg00254.php > > I think the macro and consistency suggest doing as I outlined. Does this one look like what you're suggesting? //Magnus
Вложения
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: