Re: libpq thread-locking
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq thread-locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805081809.m48I9Ld04823@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq thread-locking (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq thread-locking
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Attached patch adds some error checking to the thread locking stuff in > > libpq. Previously, if thread locking failed for some reason, we would > > just fall through and do things without locking. This patch makes us > > abort() instead. It's not the greatest thing probably, but our API > > doesn't let us pass back return values... > > I have looked over the patch and it seems fine, though I am concerned > about the abort() case with no output. I realize stderr might be going > nowhere, but in fe-print.c we do an fprintf(stderr) for memory failures > so for consistency I think we should do the same here. If there is > concern about code bloat, I suggest a macro at the top of the file for > thread failure exits: > > #define THEAD_FAILURE(str) \ > do { \ > fprintf(stderr, libpq_gettext("Thread failure: %s\n")); \ > exit(1); \ > } while(0) Oh, this is Tom saying he doesn't like stderr and the added code lines for failure: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-04/msg00254.php I think the macro and consistency suggest doing as I outlined. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: