Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805092051.m49KpH328771@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Aidan Van Dyk wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > * Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> [080509 14:43]: > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera > > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > Brendan Jurd escribi?: > > >> I for one would definitely like backslash commands with very wide > > >> output to be wrapped by default. > > > > > > (At least) one place where I would not like it is in \df+, because > > > wrapped function output would be more difficult to read. > > > > > > > I am a bit conflicted about wrapping on \df. I agree that wrapped > > function code is difficult to read, but what we've got now is > > difficult to read too. Which of the two is more difficult is really a > > matter of personal taste. I guess with \df you have to accept that > > it's always going to be ugly, unless you have a very wide terminal (or > > very short function definitions!). > > Isn't that what $PAGER is for? > > $PAGER is the main reason why *I* don't want the wrapped format. Not all pagers scroll width-wise --- in fact I thought most didn't. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: