Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands
От | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080509185151.GC18081@yugib.highrise.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d
commands
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> [080509 14:43]: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Brendan Jurd escribió: > >> I for one would definitely like backslash commands with very wide > >> output to be wrapped by default. > > > > (At least) one place where I would not like it is in \df+, because > > wrapped function output would be more difficult to read. > > > > I am a bit conflicted about wrapping on \df. I agree that wrapped > function code is difficult to read, but what we've got now is > difficult to read too. Which of the two is more difficult is really a > matter of personal taste. I guess with \df you have to accept that > it's always going to be ugly, unless you have a very wide terminal (or > very short function definitions!). Isn't that what $PAGER is for? $PAGER is the main reason why *I* don't want the wrapped format. a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: