Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:15:57 -0400
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> > > I think you can guess who says no (if not, I'll tell you out of
> > > band). I seem to be the only person doing any challenging and
> > > without some nods of agreement at least I cannot do much more. We
> > > do at least have some more documentation as of yesterday though...
> > > but the current problems are with a whole server which that doesn't
> > > help with.
> > >
> > 
> > If we're serious about doing this decoupling, I'll mention again that
> > OmniTI would be interested in helping out... fwiw we helped out the
> > PHP project setup thier current infrastructure.... and have a fair
> > amount of knowledge in the email department. 
> > 
> 
> As a note to this :) I have a customer who swears buy CMD for
> postgresql and OMNITI for their email products. I would have zero
> reservation allowing OmniTI to host our mail infrastructure (assuming
> it could be community managed).

Everyone here seems to be in agreement.  So what are the next steps? 
Setup a parallel email infrastructure, test it, and switch over?  What
else needs to be moved?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +