Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080321173522.3afa7e96@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
|
Список | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:15:57 -0400 Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > I think you can guess who says no (if not, I'll tell you out of > > band). I seem to be the only person doing any challenging and > > without some nods of agreement at least I cannot do much more. We > > do at least have some more documentation as of yesterday though... > > but the current problems are with a whole server which that doesn't > > help with. > > > > If we're serious about doing this decoupling, I'll mention again that > OmniTI would be interested in helping out... fwiw we helped out the > PHP project setup thier current infrastructure.... and have a fair > amount of knowledge in the email department. > As a note to this :) I have a customer who swears buy CMD for postgresql and OMNITI for their email products. I would have zero reservation allowing OmniTI to host our mail infrastructure (assuming it could be community managed). Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH5FRMATb/zqfZUUQRAubWAJ9E9JkuVy4N0/QbvCWz7gQIHGVt/QCfYf7E GR8qBoAst67ZR7HrytgsO6M= =6NKf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: