Re: Getting available options
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting available options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080221122259.GZ8138@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting available options (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:15:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > I like the idea that was mentioned upthread of creating a new "enum" > > > category for GUC variables, instead of continuing to abuse the rather > > > inefficient "string" category for the purpose. One reason is that > > > we then would not be faced with making an incompatible change in > > > the arguments of DefineCustomStringVariable. > > > > Yeah, I liked that one as well - I'm going to look at doing that, and will > > present some code as soon as I can to discuss the exact implementation. I > > don't think it'll be too much work. > > It seems we have two clear proposal that had clear acceptance, and for > which we now need code: this enum stuff is one, and the other one is > the addition of "file origin" to pg_settings so that you can tell > what file a setting comes from (i.e. postgresql.conf or an included > file). Yes. And IMHO those are required befoer we can implement the stuff about writing configuration variables in a good way. So they're now both high up on my TODO list. If anybody wants to work on them, please talk to me first so we don't dulpicate effort :-) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: