Re: Getting available options
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting available options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080221121513.GA7012@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting available options (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Getting available options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I like the idea that was mentioned upthread of creating a new "enum" > > category for GUC variables, instead of continuing to abuse the rather > > inefficient "string" category for the purpose. One reason is that > > we then would not be faced with making an incompatible change in > > the arguments of DefineCustomStringVariable. > > Yeah, I liked that one as well - I'm going to look at doing that, and will > present some code as soon as I can to discuss the exact implementation. I > don't think it'll be too much work. It seems we have two clear proposal that had clear acceptance, and for which we now need code: this enum stuff is one, and the other one is the addition of "file origin" to pg_settings so that you can tell what file a setting comes from (i.e. postgresql.conf or an included file). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: