Re: postgres UTC different from perl?
От | Louis-David Mitterrand |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres UTC different from perl? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071223163845.GB6472@apartia.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres UTC different from perl? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres UTC different from perl?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:14:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: > > I'm not sure that (CURRENT_DATE AT TIME ZONE 'UTC') does what you think > > it does. Try setting your timezone to various offsets and exploring. > > In fact, I think it's adjusting in exactly the wrong direction. > > I get the right number from > > regression=# select date_part('epoch', 'today'::timestamp at time zone 'UTC'); > date_part > ------------ > 1198022400 > (1 row) > > and the wrong one from > > regression=# select date_part('epoch', 'today'::timestamptz at time zone 'UTC'); > date_part > ------------ > 1198058400 > (1 row) > > and I think the locution with CURRENT_DATE is equivalent to the second > case because timestamptz is the preferred type to promote date to. Does that mean it's a postgresql bug?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: