Re: postgres UTC different from perl?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres UTC different from perl? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1685.1198113257@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres UTC different from perl? (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres UTC different from perl?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: > I'm not sure that (CURRENT_DATE AT TIME ZONE 'UTC') does what you think > it does. Try setting your timezone to various offsets and exploring. In fact, I think it's adjusting in exactly the wrong direction. I get the right number from regression=# select date_part('epoch', 'today'::timestamp at time zone 'UTC'); date_part ------------ 1198022400 (1 row) and the wrong one from regression=# select date_part('epoch', 'today'::timestamptz at time zone 'UTC'); date_part ------------ 1198058400 (1 row) and I think the locution with CURRENT_DATE is equivalent to the second case because timestamptz is the preferred type to promote date to. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: