Re: Email issues unanswered

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:46:34PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > First, I would a fix for the bug that multi-line subjects are truncated
> > > > to their first line.
> > > 
> > > Which is correct according to the RFCs 
> > 
> > Well, that depends on what you mean by "multi-line".  If what you
> > mean is "has a CRLF embedded in it to begin with", then I think
> > you're correct, because RFC 2822 section 2.2.3 says
> > 
> >    Each header field is logically a single line of characters
> >    comprising the field name, the colon, and the field body.
> > 
> > _But_ if you mean "too long for the standard 78 characters per line",
> > though, you're mistaken.  Please see RFC 2822 section 2.2.3 for more.
> 
> My long subject email going out looks like:
> 
>     From bruce Fri Jan 26 21:00:37 2007
>     Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
>             branches
>     In-Reply-To: <1169889147.3443.10.camel@laptop.gunduz.org>
>     To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>
>     Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:05:33 -0500 (EST)
>     cc: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>     X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123]
>     MIME-Version: 1.0
>     Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>     Content-Length:   797

Oh, and if I bounce this to my gmail account, it looks fine.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +