Re: Email issues unanswered

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:46:34PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > First, I would a fix for the bug that multi-line subjects are truncated
> > > to their first line.
> > 
> > Which is correct according to the RFCs 
> 
> Well, that depends on what you mean by "multi-line".  If what you
> mean is "has a CRLF embedded in it to begin with", then I think
> you're correct, because RFC 2822 section 2.2.3 says
> 
>    Each header field is logically a single line of characters
>    comprising the field name, the colon, and the field body.
> 
> _But_ if you mean "too long for the standard 78 characters per line",
> though, you're mistaken.  Please see RFC 2822 section 2.2.3 for more.

My long subject email going out looks like:
From bruce Fri Jan 26 21:00:37 2007Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
branchesIn-Reply-To:<1169889147.3443.10.camel@laptop.gunduz.org>To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>Date: Sat,
27Jan 2007 10:05:33 -0500 (EST)cc: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>,
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgX-Mailer:ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123]MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bitContent-Type:text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"Content-Length:   797
 

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +