Re: possible copyright infringement against postgresql writers, bloggers, and advocates
От | Robert Bernier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible copyright infringement against postgresql writers, bloggers, and advocates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701201552.50992.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: possible copyright infringement against (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: possible copyright infringement against
Re: possible copyright infringement against postgresql writers, bloggers, and advocates |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Bernier wrote: > > On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:03, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > The BSD license allows this. > > > > I'm not talking about source code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement > > I assume our documentation and all our postings are BSD-licensed too. Ah, I understand where you're going. Not necesarily, I'm refering to articles that have been posted on websites for profit.The website I speak of datamines as many copyrighted articles it can find off the internet and not just referencedocumentation. Dru's articles, for instance, have definitely not been BSD licensed and O'Reilly certaintly doesn'tdo that i.e. somebody is making money from other people's work. It's like I printed a few thousand copies of your PostgreSQL book (is it BSD licensed?) and kept the profits for myselfwithout giving you any royalties?
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: