Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200611172109.53873.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > We should also take the opportunity to discuss new keywords for the > XML support -- will we use new grammar, or functions? The XML stuff is defined in the SQL standard and there are existing implementations, so any nonstandard syntax is going to be significantly less useful. (The other problem is that you can't implement most of the stuff in functions anyway.) I don't see any comparable arguments about this full-text search stuff. In particular I don't see any arguments why a change would necessary at all, including why moving to core would be necessary in the first place. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: