Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19449.1163794687@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I don't see any comparable arguments about this full-text search stuff. > In particular I don't see any arguments why a change would necessary at > all, including why moving to core would be necessary in the first > place. AFAIR the only argument in favor of that is basically a marketing one: users perceive a feature as more real, or more supported, if it's in core. I don't find this argument especially compelling myself. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: