Re: Index Tuning Features
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index Tuning Features |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061011200021.GE25181@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index Tuning Features (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index Tuning Features
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:40:42PM -0400, Gregory Stark wrote: > poorly written query. In fact Oracle is going in the opposite direction of > even relying on hints internally. Its plan stability feature depends on > generating and storing hints internally associated with every query. But IBM, whose DB2 planner and optimiser is generally regarded as way better than Oracle's (at least by anyone I know who's used both), doesn't like hints. The IBM people all say the same thing Tom has said before: that the work to design the thing correctly is better spent making the planner and optimiser parts smarter and cheaper, because out of that work you also manage not to have the DBA accidentally mess things up by simple-minded rule-based hints. (Note that I'm not trying to wade into the actual argument; I'm just pointing out that even the biggest industry people don't agree on this point.) A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are against all taxes for raising money to pay it off. --Alexander Hamilton
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: