Re: Draft release notes

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> My memory says this was eventually removed, even though it was committed
> >> for a time. Am I wrong?
> >> - Make EXPLAIN sampling smarter, to avoid excessive sampling delay
> >> (Martijn van Oosterhout)
> 
> > I see a reversion for EXPLAIN ANALYZE only:
> 
> >     date: 2006/06/09 19:30:56;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines: +27 -172
> >     Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too
> >     unreliable because node timing is much less predictable than the patch
> >     expects.  I kept the API change for InstrStopNode, however.
> 
> > so the item is probably still OK.
> 
> No, Simon is right, that entry should be removed --- there's nothing
> interesting left of the patch :-(

I see.  Removed.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +