Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608160810.07891.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > that the bug tracker would have to have a reasonable "output" email > > capability, but I'd not necessarily insist on being able to "input" > > to it by mail. Red Hat's present bugzilla system could be described > > that way --- and while I can't say I'm in love with it, I can deal > > with it. > > Bugzilla is good in that you need to sign up to report anything (or at > least it can be configured that way, not sure), which might reduce the > amount of noise. The other systems that have been mentioned have by > design little or no barrier of entry, which doesn't seem to be what we > want. I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can email the bugs list or use the bugs -> email form from the website. Are you looking to increase the barrier for bug reporting? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: