Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608160652.23566.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > that the bug tracker would have to have a reasonable "output" email > capability, but I'd not necessarily insist on being able to "input" > to it by mail. Red Hat's present bugzilla system could be described > that way --- and while I can't say I'm in love with it, I can deal > with it. Bugzilla is good in that you need to sign up to report anything (or at least it can be configured that way, not sure), which might reduce the amount of noise. The other systems that have been mentioned have by design little or no barrier of entry, which doesn't seem to be what we want. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: