Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 3-rd try
От | Ludek Finstrle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 3-rd try |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060609121323.GA17258@soptik.pzkagis.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) (Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 3-rd try
Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 4-th try |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> > > buf = "text"; > > > snprintf(buf,size,"%s append",buf); > > > > > > buf = "text append" on Windows (MS VC compiler) > > > buf = " append" on linux (gcc compiler) > > > > > > I solve it this way (main idea): > > > snprintf(buf + strlen(buf), " append"); > > > > Hmm bad news. > > If so, it may be better to use the sequence like the following for example. > > > > char *query_ptr; > > size_t bufsize_res; > > int slen; > > > > /* Initialize */ > > query_ptr = columns_query; > > bufsize_res = sizeof(columns_query); > > > > if (..) > > { > > if ((slen = snprintf(query_ptr, bufsize_res, .., )) <= 0) > > { > > .. error_handling .. > > } > > query_ptr += slen; > > bufsize_res -= slen; > > } > > > > ... > > I'm not sure. There are a lot of strcat, my_strcat, schema_strcat calls > between snprintf. There is only one place where snprintf could be called > after another snprintf. I change the snprintf_addlen to snprintf_len as you mentioned. Third try of patch attached. Comments are welcome Luf
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: