Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650)
От | Ludek Finstrle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060609081637.GA8153@soptik.pzkagis.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for snprintf problem (bug #1000650) 3-rd try
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> > buf = "text"; > > snprintf(buf,size,"%s append",buf); > > > > buf = "text append" on Windows (MS VC compiler) > > buf = " append" on linux (gcc compiler) > > > > I solve it this way (main idea): > > snprintf(buf + strlen(buf), " append"); > > Hmm bad news. > If so, it may be better to use the sequence like the following for example. > > char *query_ptr; > size_t bufsize_res; > int slen; > > /* Initialize */ > query_ptr = columns_query; > bufsize_res = sizeof(columns_query); > > if (..) > { > if ((slen = snprintf(query_ptr, bufsize_res, .., )) <= 0) > { > .. error_handling .. > } > query_ptr += slen; > bufsize_res -= slen; > } > > ... I'm not sure. There are a lot of strcat, my_strcat, schema_strcat calls between snprintf. There is only one place where snprintf could be called after another snprintf. BTW it's something what snprintf_addlen is doing. Or am I miss something? I do the patch with minimal changes in mind. In my opinion strcat may be faster in joining more char *. Regards, Luf
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: