Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Why can PLs not handle pseudo-types?
> >
> >No one's done the work to figure out which ones are sensible to
> >support and then add the logic needed to support them.
> >
> PL/Java will handle the RECORD type correctly. I'm just finalizing a
> new, more flexible, type mapping implementation for PL/Java and it
> would be easy to add support for more pseudo types too. But what
> others would make sense?

Ideally, some way to get all kinds of user-defined types.  DOMAINs,
too. :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666                             Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!