Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060321145839.68211.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help
Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hello, I've got 2 tables, "url" (U), and "bookmark" (B), with "bookmark" pointing to "url" via FK. Somehow I ended up with some rows in B referencing non-existent rows in U. This sounds super strange and dangerous to me, and it's not clear to me how/why PG let this happen. I'm using 8.0.3. Here are the table references I just mentioned: Table "bookmark": id SERIAL CONSTRAINT pk_bookmark_id PRIMARY KEYTable "url": url_id INTEGER CONSTRAINT fk_bookmark_id REFERENCES bookmark(id) Problem #1: Strange that PG allowed this to happen. Maybe my DDL above allows this to happen and needs to be tightened? I thought the above would ensure referential integrity, but maybe I need to specify something else? Problem #2: I'd like to find all rows in B that point to non-existent rows in U. I can do it with the following sub-select,I believe, but it's rather inefficient (EXPLAIN shows both tables would be sequentially scanned): SELECT * FROM bookmark WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT b.id FROM bookmark b, url u WHERE b.url_id=u.id); Is there a more efficient way to get the rows from "bookmark"? Thanks, Otis
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: