Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help

delete my email from the list

Regards,





-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of
ogjunk-pgjedan@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:29 PM
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: [SQL] Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help


Hello,

I've got 2 tables, "url" (U), and "bookmark" (B), with "bookmark" pointing
to "url" via FK.
Somehow I ended up with some rows in B referencing non-existent rows in U.
This sounds super strange and dangerous to me, and it's not clear to me
how/why PG let this happen.
I'm using 8.0.3.

Here are the table references I just mentioned:

Table "bookmark":    id                  SERIAL                        CONSTRAINT pk_bookmark_id PRIMARY KEY
Table "url":   url_id              INTEGER                        CONSTRAINT fk_bookmark_id REFERENCES bookmark(id)


Problem #1: Strange that PG allowed this to happen.  Maybe my DDL above
allows this to happen and needs to be tightened?  I thought the above would
ensure referential integrity, but maybe I need to specify something else?

Problem #2: I'd like to find all rows in B that point to non-existent rows
in U.  I can do it with the following sub-select, I believe, but it's rather
inefficient (EXPLAIN shows both tables would be sequentially scanned):
 SELECT * FROM bookmark WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT b.id FROM bookmark b, url u
WHERE b.url_id=u.id);

Is there a more efficient way to get the rows from "bookmark"?

Thanks,
Otis


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend