Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200601041608.k04G8N629967@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database to login to to create global users?) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database to login to to create global users?)
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote: > Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> writes: > > On 1/3/06, pres <pgn.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified > >> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the > >> documentation does contain it, not necessary. > > > is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work... > > It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not > necessarily the first thing you want to know about it. I am thinking the table should be split into two, one for the global tables, and another for the db-local tables. I don't think we make it clear enough which tables are global. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: