Re: -fPIC
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: -fPIC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050911205705.GB6026@ns.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: -fPIC (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e@gmx.net) wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > The reason for -fpic vs -fPIC (on the machines where it makes any > > difference at all) is that the former is faster. > > I don't doubt that, but out of curiosity, considering that everyone else > is using libtool, and libtool always uses -fPIC, what kind of impact > does this *really* have? I certainly wouldn't assume something done in libtool is necessairly the 'smart' approach, ever. > > I think the correct answer is for PL/Java to do s/-fpic/-fPIC/ on > > CFLAGS in its Makefile, rather than trying to force the same on > > everything else. > > That would certainly work, but is that the kind of interface we want to > offer? In the extreme case, a module could end up redefining a great > deal of the shared library knowledge that it was supposed to not have > to care about. I don't think it's all that sane to expect a generalized build system to support every possible library compilation requirement... Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: