Re: -fPIC
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: -fPIC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200509111911.19797.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: -fPIC (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: -fPIC
Re: -fPIC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > PL/Java is bigger than the whole backend? No, it's not, but the backend is not compiled as position-independent. > The reason for -fpic vs -fPIC (on the machines where it makes any > difference at all) is that the former is faster. I don't doubt that, but out of curiosity, considering that everyone else is using libtool, and libtool always uses -fPIC, what kind of impact does this *really* have? > I think the correct answer is for PL/Java to do s/-fpic/-fPIC/ on > CFLAGS in its Makefile, rather than trying to force the same on > everything else. That would certainly work, but is that the kind of interface we want to offer? In the extreme case, a module could end up redefining a great deal of the shared library knowledge that it was supposed to not have to care about. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: