Re: Select performance vs. mssql
От | mark durrant |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Select performance vs. mssql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050524064034.18213.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Select performance vs. mssql (mark durrant <markd89@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Select performance vs. mssql
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> Post the result of this for us: > > explain analyze select count(*) from mtable where > day='Mon'; > > On both machines. Hi Chris -- PostgreSQL Machine: "Aggregate (cost=140122.56..140122.56 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=24516.000..24516.000 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using "day" on mtable (cost=0.00..140035.06 rows=35000 width=0) (actual time=47.000..21841.000 rows=1166025 loops=1)" " Index Cond: ("day" = 'Mon'::bpchar)" "Total runtime: 24516.000 ms" (Note this took 24 seconds after fresh reboot, next execution was 11, and execution without explain analyze was 6.7 seconds) MSSQL Machine: That "Explain Analyze" command doesn't work for MSSQL, but I did view the Query plan. 97% of it was "Scanning a particular range of rows from a nonclustered index" Thanks for your help --Mark __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: