Select performance vs. mssql
| От | mark durrant |
|---|---|
| Тема | Select performance vs. mssql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050524054715.3988.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Select performance vs. mssql
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I have some experience with MSSQL and am examining PostgreSQL. I'm running under Windows. I like what I see so far, but I'm hoping for some performance advice: 1. My test database has 7 million records. 2. There are two columns - an integer and a char column called Day which has a random value of Mon or Tues, etc. in it. 3. I made an index on Day. My query is: select count(*) from mtable where day='Mon' Results: 1. P3 600 512MB RAM MSSQL. It takes about 4-5 secs to run. If I run a few queries and everything is cached, it is sometimes just 1 second. 2. Athlon 1.3 Ghz 1GB RAM. PostgreSQL takes 7 seconds. I have played with the buffers setting and currently have it at 7500. At 20000 it took over 20 seconds to run. 5 seconds vs 7 isn't that big of a deal, but 1 second vs 7 seconds is. Also, the slower performance is with much lesser hardware. Any ideas to try? Thanks much, Mark __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: