Re: Patch for disaster recovery
| От | Bruno Wolff III |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch for disaster recovery |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050220152516.GA23706@wolff.to обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch for disaster recovery (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Patch for disaster recovery
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:43:11 -0500, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > > We regularly have people on IRC who delete data and then want to recover > it. By having the define it makes it easier for us to help them without > them having to add actual C code. > > Does that make sense? You aren't going to get a consistant snapshot if you get back all of the deleted rows. With autovacuum it is going to get harder to do this, because accidentally making large changes in a table is going to trigger a vacuum. It seems like the right way to do this is a recovery using the PITR system and putting effort into making that easier is the way to go.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: