Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050215213951.GO52357@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
They also say that mysql is free, which isn't the case for commercial applications. On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:36:44PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Friday 11 Feb 2005 6:07 pm, Marques Johansson wrote: > > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003: > > > > http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/freeware/mysql-vs-pgsql.html > > > > With the release of PostgreSQL 8.0, how does PostgreSQL currently stand? > > That seems to be fairly old and hence out-of-sync. Things have move a lot > since, for all the products involved. > > But still I find it rather harsh on postgresql. 8K row limit is long gone and > postgresql does support online backup, to mention a few. > > PostgreSQL now has native windows port, tablespaces and many many replication > solutions, not to mention a list of companies that offer PostgreSQL support. > > Shridhar > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: