Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200502141936.44244.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card (Marques Johansson <marques@displague.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Friday 11 Feb 2005 6:07 pm, Marques Johansson wrote: > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003: > > http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/freeware/mysql-vs-pgsql.html > > With the release of PostgreSQL 8.0, how does PostgreSQL currently stand? That seems to be fairly old and hence out-of-sync. Things have move a lot since, for all the products involved. But still I find it rather harsh on postgresql. 8K row limit is long gone and postgresql does support online backup, to mention a few. PostgreSQL now has native windows port, tablespaces and many many replication solutions, not to mention a list of companies that offer PostgreSQL support. Shridhar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: