Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200401230456.i0N4u8q01669@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes: > > Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for > > __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that? > > Move along. Nothing to see here. > > Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is > gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows? > > We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock > support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate > assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s). MinGW only uses gcc so we are OK there. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: