Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11202.1074005825@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes: > Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for > __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that? > Move along. Nothing to see here. Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows? We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: