Re: RedHat attitude
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RedHat attitude |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200212161014.53758.jm.poure@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RedHat attitude (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: RedHat attitude
Re: RedHat attitude |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Le Dimanche 15 Décembre 2002 23:14, Gavin Sherry a écrit : > Red Hat employ. Tom and some other programmers who work on Postgres. They > don't appear to drag Tom around the world like a show pony. In fact, Red > Hat do not do that to any of the programmers they employ. They have to > make money from that and if that means selling software and services, so > be it. Anything Red Hat does in marketing the Red Hat Database will help > PostgreSQL -- it increases the market for open source databases and it > increases the people's exposure to PostgreSQL. Dear Gavin, I agree with you as regards employment and RedHat marketing efforts. My only concerns are that : 1) Changing PostgreSQL name to RedHat database is unfair and useless. 2) RedHat may close RedHat database sources in a near future. Kpackage dissapeared from RedHat 8.0. People will soon have to pay to download RPM packages. As regards the PostgreSQL license, do you think it is ***technicaly*** possible to close RedHat database sources? I don't know the PostgreSQL license enough to answer the question. Maybe you know the answer, can it be done by law? Cheers, Jean-Michel
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: