Re: transactions

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:38AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> > Which reminds me, when Oracle was responding to the .org using postgresql
> > issue they said that Postgresql doesn't support transactions.  Did they
> > even bother looking at the docs for Postgresql before spewing their lame
> > crap???  Probably not.
>
> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
> database".  While that is presumably something beyond just
> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
> actually to be.  Anyone got any ideas?

They were confusing us with MySQL.  It was a marketing guy.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073