Re: transactions

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:38AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:

> Which reminds me, when Oracle was responding to the .org using postgresql
> issue they said that Postgresql doesn't support transactions.  Did they
> even bother looking at the docs for Postgresql before spewing their lame
> crap???  Probably not.

To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
database".  While that is presumably something beyond just
"transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
actually to be.  Anyone got any ideas?

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110