Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200209172107.g8HL7wk19181@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > Which in this case is what puzzles me. We are only talking about a > simple GUC variable after all - I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing > it's not a huge effort to add one? Can we get agreement on that? A GUC for pg_xlog location? Much cleaner than -X, doesn't have the problems of possible accidental use, and does allow pg_xlog moving without symlinks, which some people don't like? If I can get a few 'yes' votes I will add it to TODO and do it for 7.4. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: