Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8681F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | PGXLOG variable worthwhile? (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl@familyhealth.com.au] > Sent: 17 September 2002 09:49 > To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in; Pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Cc: Pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? > > > Users HAVE provided their feedback - they want Postgres on > Windows. What's the point of open source if we can't > accomodate them? There's no problems with economics, > marketing, schedules, deadlines, nothing. The reason that > people like Open Source is because they don't have to deal > with some monolithic company refusing to port to their > platform just because it's "too hard". Which in this case is what puzzles me. We are only talking about a simple GUC variable after all - I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing it's not a huge effort to add one? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: