Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package?
От | Ned Wolpert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020102172747.52221.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package? (Kovács Péter <peter.kovacs@sysdata.siemens.hu>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Is the connection susposed to be released in the commit()? I thought that the application server would release it, and/or place the connection back in the pool. (I need to look at the spec) Remember, the pooling side of the XA stuff for postgresql doesn't work by itself. I know tyrex has its own pooling system, but I had thought that it required more behavior from the jdbc driver than we had. Can you create a patch so we can see your changes? I'd like to see what changes you made. --- Kov�cs_P�ter <peter.kovacs@sysdata.siemens.hu> wrote: > The physical connection is not released in XAResourceImpl.commit() after > a > successful commit (on the physical connection). This results in a > constantly > increasing number of physical connections, even if only one physical > connection is needed at a time. (A physical connection gets > recycled/"garbage collected", as the package internal timer for the > transaction, in which the connection participated, expires.) ===== Virtually, | "Must you shout too?" Ned Wolpert | -Dante wolpert@yahoo.com | _________________/ "Who watches the watchmen?" 4e75 -Juvenal, 120 AD -- Place your commercial here -- fnord __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: